Profile

Contact Details

Tim Dwight

This individual is no longer active. Application functionality related to this individual is limited.

Contributions

1 to 5 of 5 total
Posted By Tim Dwight 02-23-2021 09:01:00 PM
Found In Egroup: ATIS/SIP Forum IP-NNI Task Force
\ view thread
Yep. Just pulling your leg. I think I’m older but as Reagan said I won’t hold against you, your youth and inexperience. Keep fighting the good fight, tim From: ipnni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ipnni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of DOLLY, MARTIN C Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 2:49 PM To: Dwight, Timothy ...
Posted By Tim Dwight 02-23-2021 08:58:00 PM
Found In Egroup: ATIS/SIP Forum IP-NNI Task Force
\ view thread
Understood, except for the bit about â calling numbers that are classified as Wireless should not be seen on a call center traffic â. I assume what youâre saying is that itâs obvious to you that a number you believe is assigned to a mobile device, should not appear as the calling party number in a ...
Posted By Tim Dwight 02-23-2021 08:47:00 PM
Found In Egroup: ATIS/SIP Forum IP-NNI Task Force
\ view thread
Thanks, Bob. I understand your logic but I don’t see in the text you quoted, any prohibition of transit carriers blocking calls or sending 608 responses. Tim p.s. I suspect it might well be the case that a call blocked by one transit carrier would succeed if routed via another. They may use different ...
Posted By Tim Dwight 02-23-2021 08:13:00 PM
Found In Egroup: ATIS/SIP Forum IP-NNI Task Force
\ view thread
The I-D seems to allow any intermediary to signal 608. From its introduction: This document describes a new SIP response code, 608, which allows calling parties to learn that an intermediary rejected their call. Of course from the IETF’s perspective anything other than UAC and UAS is “an intermediary”, ...