Skip main navigation (Press Enter).
Log in
Toggle navigation
Home
Projects
Groups
My Groups
All Groups
Events
Public Workspace
Member Home (Admin)
Help/FAQs
Log in
Profile
×
Contact Details
×
Enter Password
Enter Password
Confirm Password
Tim Dwight
This individual is no longer active. Application functionality related to this individual is limited.
Profile
Contributions
List of Contributions
Contributions
1 to 5 of 5 total
search criteria =
ALL
[nni] [ipnni] Always before a long weekend.... Attachments
Posted By
Tim Dwight
01-19-2024 11:28:26 PM
Found In
Library:
ATIS/SIP Forum IP-NNI Task Force
RE: [nni] [ipnni] Always before a long weekend....
Posted By
Tim Dwight
02-23-2021 09:01:00 PM
Found In
Egroup:
ATIS/SIP Forum IP-NNI Task Force
\
view thread
Yep. Just pulling your leg. I think I’m older but as Reagan said I won’t hold against you, your youth and inexperience. Keep fighting the good fight, tim From: ipnni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ipnni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of DOLLY, MARTIN C Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 2:49 PM To: Dwight, Timothy ...
RE: [E] Re: [nni] [ipnni] Always before a long weekend....
Posted By
Tim Dwight
02-23-2021 08:58:00 PM
Found In
Egroup:
ATIS/SIP Forum IP-NNI Task Force
\
view thread
Understood, except for the bit about â calling numbers that are classified as Wireless should not be seen on a call center traffic â. I assume what youâre saying is that itâs obvious to you that a number you believe is assigned to a mobile device, should not appear as the calling party number in a ...
RE: [nni] [ipnni] Always before a long weekend....
Posted By
Tim Dwight
02-23-2021 08:47:00 PM
Found In
Egroup:
ATIS/SIP Forum IP-NNI Task Force
\
view thread
Thanks, Bob. I understand your logic but I don’t see in the text you quoted, any prohibition of transit carriers blocking calls or sending 608 responses. Tim p.s. I suspect it might well be the case that a call blocked by one transit carrier would succeed if routed via another. They may use different ...
RE: [nni] [ipnni] Always before a long weekend....
Posted By
Tim Dwight
02-23-2021 08:13:00 PM
Found In
Egroup:
ATIS/SIP Forum IP-NNI Task Force
\
view thread
The I-D seems to allow any intermediary to signal 608. From its introduction: This document describes a new SIP response code, 608, which allows calling parties to learn that an intermediary rejected their call. Of course from the IETF’s perspective anything other than UAC and UAS is “an intermediary”, ...
Contact Us
1200 G St. NW
Suite 500
Washington, DC 20005
Phone
+1 202 628 6380
Membership
Join
Benefits
Privacy & Terms
About Us
Privacy Policy
Copyright 2025. All rights reserved.
Powered by Higher Logic