Profile

Contact Details

Mr. James Hamlin


Contributions

1 to 4 of 4 total
Posted By James Hamlin 03-03-2020 05:50:00 PM
Found In Egroup: ATIS/SIP Forum IP-NNI Task Force
\ view thread
Robert I can see your point, but we felt that the previous paragraph would be interpreted as requiring the VRS provider to show that they have some direct authority to use the number, which they don't necessarily have. In the dial-around case, the number would be assigned to another VRS Provider and ...
Posted By James Hamlin 03-03-2020 03:38:00 PM
Found In Egroup: ATIS/SIP Forum IP-NNI Task Force
\ view thread
Submitter's message Contribution to ATIS-1000074.v003, adding one bullet item to note 1 to the criteria for 'A' attestation; this specifically addresses attestation of VRS calls which in some cases traverse between VRS providers before being presented to an OSP:- The customer is a FCC certified Video ...
Posted By James Hamlin 02-17-2020 09:25:00 PM
Found In Egroup: ATIS/SIP Forum IP-NNI Task Force
\ view thread
Submitter's message This document supports the work of the ATIS/SIP Forum NNI Task Force. In general the use cases of the VRS industry can be accommodated by solutions being worked on by the group. We try to clarify that OSPs used by VRS Providers should be able to attest fully for VRS calls on account ...
Posted By James Hamlin 07-11-2019 09:57:00 AM
Found In Egroup: ATIS/SIP Forum IP-NNI Task Force
\ view thread
Richard This call flow is working today, it’s not a new one for IVC. There seem to be two broad solutions, to the dial-around-delay problem:- 1. The administrative solution where the OSP attests for all calls from its customer the VRS provider regardless of the fact that the VRS provider can only provide ...