|
Document Details
|
| Name |
 (1MB) |
| Description |
This document provides an analysis of the open issue regarding whether the RPH namespace claims should be part of the same identity header used for Calling Party Number (CPN) signing, or whether it should be included in a separate identity header and recommends a path forward. |
| Document State |
Contribution ((e.g., text to progress Issues)) |
| Group / Folder |
ATIS/SIP Forum IP-NNI Task Force / IPNNI / 2017 |
| Submitter |
By Mr. Ray Singh on Sunday, 07 May 2017 01:20pm |
| Technical Contact |
None Selected |
| Public URL |
https://access.atis.org/apps/group_public/document.php?document_id=34248&wg_abbrev=ipnni |
